Dangerous Nanoparticles Contaminate 43 Leading Vaccines – Groundbreaking Study

New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination

Deutsche Übersetzung PDF Original Study at MedCrave Original PDF

Antonietta M Gatti1,2, Stefano Montanari3
1National Council of Research of Italy, Institute for the Science and Technology of Ceramics, Italy
2International Clean Water Institute, USA
3Nanodiagnostics srl, Italy

Correspondence: Dr. Antonietta Gatti, National Council of Research of Italy, c/o Nanodiagnostics Via E. Fermi, 1/L, 41057 San Vito (MO), Italy, Tel 059798778

Received: November 30, 2016 | Published: January 23, 2017

Citation: Gatti AM, Montanari S (2016) New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro- and Nanocontamination. Int J Vaccines Vaccin 4(1): 00072. DOI: 10.15406/ijvv.2017.04.00072


Vaccines are being under investigation for the possible side effects they can cause. In order to supply new information, an electron-microscopy investigation method was applied to the study of vaccines, aimed at verifying the presence of solid contaminants by means of an Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope equipped with an X-ray microprobe. The results of this new investigation show the presence of micro- and nanosized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements in vaccines’ samples which is not declared among the components and whose unduly presence is, for the time being, inexplicable. A considerable part of those particulate contaminants have already been verified in other matrices and reported in literature as non biodegradable and non biocompatible. The evidence collected is suggestive of some hypotheses correlated to diseases that are mentioned and briefly discussed.

Keywords: Vaccine; Disease; Contamination; Protein corona; Biocompatibility; Toxicity; Nanoparticle; Immunogenicity; Foreign body; Environment; Industrial process; Quality control


Vaccines are one of the most notable inventions meant to protect people from infectious diseases. The practice of variolation is century-old and is mentioned in Chinese and Indian documents dated around 1000 A.D. Over time, variolation has been replaced by vaccination, vaccines have been enhanced as to technology, and the vaccination practice is now standardized worldwide.

Side effects have always been reported but in the latest years it seems that they have increased in number and seriousness, particularly in children as the American Academy of pediatrics reports [1,2]. For instance, the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTaP) vaccine was linked to cases of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) [3]; measles-mumps-rubella vaccine with autism [4,5]; multiple immunizations with immune disorders [6]; hepatitis B vaccines with multiple sclerosis, etc.

The notice of Tripedia DTaP by Sanofi Pasteur reports “Adverse events reported during post-approval use of Tripedia vaccine include idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, SIDS, anaphylactic reaction, cellulitis, autism, convulsion/grand mal convulsion, encephalopathia, hypotonia, neuropathy, somnolence and apnea”. The epidemiological studies carried out did not show a clear evidence of those associations, even if in 2011 the National Academy of Medicine (formerly, IOM) admitted: “Vaccines are not free from side effects, or adverse effects”[7].

Specific researches on components of the vaccines like adjuvants (in most instances, Aluminum salts) are already indicated as possible responsible of neurological symptoms [8-10] and in some cases, in-vivo tests and epidemiological studies demonstrated a possible correlation with neurological diseases [10,11]. Neurological damages induced in patients under hemodialysis treated with water containing Aluminum are reported in literature [12].

Recently, with the worldwide-adopted vaccines against Human Papillomavirus (HPV), the debate was reawaken due to some adverse effects reported by some young subjects.

Specific studies communicated the existence of symptoms related to never-described-before syndromes developed after the vaccine was administered. For instance, Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS), and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) [13]. The side-effects that can arise within a relatively short time can be local or systemic.

Pain at the site of injection, swelling and uncontrollable movement of the hands (though this last symptom can also be considered systemic) are described. Among the systemic effects, fever, headache, irritability, epileptic seizures, temporary speech loss, lower limbs dysaesthesia and paresis, hot flashes, sleep disorders, hypersensitivity reactions, muscle pain, recurrent syncope, constant hunger, significant gait impairment, incapacity to maintain the orthostatic posture are reported [14].

It is a matter of fact that every day millions of vaccine doses are administered and nothing notable happens, but it is also irrefutable that, regardless of the amount of side effects that are not recorded and the percentage of which remains in fact unknown, in a limited number cases something wrong occurs. No satisfactory explanation or, in many cases, no explanation at all has been given and it seems that those adverse effects happen on a random and stochastic basis.

Those situations induced us to verify the safety of vaccines from a point of view which was never adopted before: not a biological, but a physical approach. So, we developed a new analysis method based on the use of a Field Emission Gun Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope investigations to detect possible physical contamination in those products.

Materials and Methods

44 types of vaccines coming from 2 countries (Italy and France) were analyzed. Table 1 groups them in terms of name, brand and purpose.

N Name Brand Name, Country of Distribution Description Production Batch, Expiry Date
1 Vivotif Berna Berna Biotech SA, Italy Anti-Thyphoid Vaccine (Live), group Ty21a 3000336 [2004]
2 Typhim Vi Aventis Pasteur MSD, Italy Anti-Salmonella typhi Vaccine U1510-2 [2004]
3 Typherix GlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., Italy Anti-Thypoid Vaccine (polysaccharide Vi) ATYPB061BB [2009]
4 Anatetall Chiron (now Novartis) Italy Adsorbed anti-Tetanus Vaccine 030106 [2004]
5 Anatetall Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Italy Adsorbed anti-Tetanus Vaccine 060510 [2009]
6 Tetabulin Baxter AG, Italy Adsorbed anti-Tetanus Vaccine VNG2G006A [2009]
7 Dif-Tet-All Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics, Italy Adsorbed anti-Tetanus and diphtheria Vaccine 070501 [2009]
8 Infanrix GlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., Italy Anti-Diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccine AC14B071AJ [2009]
9 Infanrix hexa GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals s, Italy Anti-diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b A21CC512A [ 2017]
10 Infanrix hexa GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals s. a. France Anti-diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, poliomyelitis and disease caused by Haemophilus influenzae type b A21CC421A [ 2017]
11 M-M-R vaxPro Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Italy M-M-R vaxPro (measles, mumps, and rubella) analyzed in Cambridge L012437 [ 2017]
12 Repevax Sanofi Pasteur MSD, France Anti-diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-vaccine L0362-1 [2017]
13 Repevax Sanofi Pasteur MSD SNC France Anti-diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-polio-vaccine L0033-1 [2016]
14 Priorix GlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., Italy Anti–measles-mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine A69CB550A [2009]
15 Morupar Chiron (now Novartis, ), Italy Anti-measles- mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine 7601 [2004]
16 Varilrix GlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., Italy Anti-Chicken pox vaccine (group OKA) A70CA567A [2009]
17 Stamaril Pasteur Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Italy anti-yellow fever vaccine A5329-6 [2009]
18 Allergoid-Adsorbat 6-Graser Starke B. Allergopharma, Germany Antiallergic vaccine Ch-B.:30005999-B [2006]
19 Engerix-B GlaxoSmithKline S.p.a., Italy Adsorbed anti-hepatitis B vaccine AHBVB468BD [2009]
20 Prenevar 13 Pfizer, Italy Antipneumococcal vaccine G79324 [2013]
21 Prevenar 13 Pfizer, France Antipneumococcal vaccine N27430 [ 2018]
22 Mencevax Acwy GlaxoSmithKline, Italy anti-Neisseria meningococcal group A, C, W135 and Y vaccine N402A47B 12 [2004]
23 Meningitec Pfizer, Italy (group C 10) (adsorbed on Al-Phosphate) H92709 [2015]
24 Meningitec Pfizer-Italy Anti-meningococcus (group C 10) vaccine (adsorbed on Al-Phosphate) H20500 [2014]
25 Meningitec Pfizer-Italy Anti-meningococcus vaccine sequestred by Procura della Repubblica G76673 [2014]
26 Meningitec Pfizer-Italy Anti-meningococcus vaccine sequestred by Procura della Repubblica H99459 [2015]
27 Meningitec Pfizer-Italy Anti-meningococcus vaccine sequestred by Procura della Repubblica H52269 [2015]
28 Menjugate Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Anti-meningococcus group C YA0163AB [2010]
29 Menveo Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Antimeningococcus groups A, C, W135, Y A15083 [2017]
30 Meningitec Wyeth Pharmaceutical – France Anti-meningococcus group C vaccine E83920 [2011]
31 Inflexal V Berna Biotech Anti-flu vaccine 2008/2009 3001463-01 [2009]
32 Vaxigrip Sanofi Pasteur MSD Anti-flu vaccine 2008/2009 D9703-1 [2009]
33 Vaxigrip Sanofi Pasteur Anti-flu vaccine 2012/2013 J8401-1 [2013]
34 Vaxigrip Sanofi Pasteur, Italy Anti-flu vaccine, with inactivated and split virus M7319-1 [2016]
35 Focetria Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Anti-pandemic flu H1N1 vaccine 0902401 [2010]
36 Agrippal Novartis Anti-flu vaccine 2012/2013 127002A [2013]
37 Agrippal Novartis vaccines, Italy Anti-flu vaccine with inactivated and split virus 2015/2016 – 152803 [2016]
38 Agrippal S1 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Anti-flu inactivated/superficial antigene v – 2014/2015 147302A [2015]
39 Fluarix GlaxoSmithKline – GSK Anti-flu vaccine 2013 AFLUA789AA [2014]
40 Fluad Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Anti-flu inactivated/superficial antigene vaccine – 2014/2015 142502 [2015]
41 Gardasil Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Italy Anti-HPV types 6,11,16,18 vaccine NP01250 [2012]
42 Gardasil Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Italy Anti-HPV (types 6,11,16,18) vaccine K023804 [2016]
43 Cervarix GlaxoSmithKline Biological, Italy Anti-HPV (type 16,18) AHPVA238AX [2017]
44 Feligen CRP Virbac S.A. – Carros – Italy anti-panleucopenia, infectious rhinotracheitis and infections by Calcivirus, veterinary Vaccine for cats 3R4R [2013]
Table 1: List of vaccines analyzed, according to their purpose.

Some vaccines, in fact a minority, are meant to deal with a single bacterium or virus, while others are multi-valent. The list of vaccines we analyzed may contain repeated names, because we considered different batches and years of production of the same vaccine: the ones against influenza in particular.

The study was aimed at verifying a possible physical contamination. To do that, we performed a new kind of investigation based on observations under a Field Emission Gun Environmental Electron Scanning Microscope (FEG-ESEM, Quanta 200, FEI, The Netherlands) equipped with the X-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive Spectroscope (EDS, EDAX, Mahwah, NJ, USA) to detect the possible presence of inorganic, particulate contaminants and identify their chemical composition.

A drop of about 20 microliter of vaccine is released from the syringe on a 25-mm-diameter cellulose filter (Millipore, USA), inside a flow cabinet. The filter is then deposited on an Aluminum stub covered with an adhesive carbon disc. The sample is immediately put inside a clean box in order to avoid any contamination and the box is re-opened only for the sample to be inserted inside the FEG-ESEM chamber. We selected that particular type of microscope as it allows to analyse watery and oily samples in low vacuum (from 10 to 130 Pa) at a high sensitivity.

When the water and saline the vaccine contains are evaporated, the biological/physical components emerge on the filter and it is then possible to observe them. This type of microscope (low-vacuum observations) prevents the possible sample contamination and the creation of artefacts. The observations are made with different sensors (SE: secondary-electron sensor and BSE: backscattered-electron sensor), and are performed at a pressure of 8.9 e-1 mbar, at energies ranging from 10 to 30kV to detect the particulate matter’s size, morphology and its elemental composition. The method identifies clearly inorganic bodies with a higher atomic density (looking whiter) than the biological substrate. So, organic entities are visible and easy to distinguish from inorganic ones. The method cannot distinguish between proteins and organic adjuvants (e.g. squalene, glutamate, proteins, etc.) or viruses, bacteria, bacteria’s DNA, endo-toxins and bacteria’s waste, but their comparatively low atomic density allows us to identify these entities as organic matter. In some vaccines, the organic matter contains white-looking debris named aggregates, while a high concentration or inorganic debris is called a cluster.

Single inorganic particles or organic-inorganic aggregates are identified, evaluated and counted. The counting procedure is repeated three times by three different operators, with an error lower than 10%. When a layer of salts (Sodium chloride or Aluminum) is detected, we record the situation but we do not do body count.


The investigations verified the physical-chemical composition of the vaccines considered according to the inorganic component as declared by the Producer. In detail, we verified the presence of saline and Aluminum salts, but further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases, whose presence was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the product (Table 2).

N Company Name Aluminum Elements Identified
1 Allergopharma – Germany Allergoid yes Al
2 Aventis Pasteur MSD Lyon – Francie Typhim Vi no BrKP, PbSi, FeCr, PbClSiTi
3 Baxter AG Tetabulin no SiMg, Fe, SiTiAl, SBa, Zn
4 Berna Biotech Vivotif Berna no FeAl, ZrAlHf, SrAl, BiAlCl
5 Berna Biotech Inflexal V no CuSnPbZn, Fe, CaSiAl, SiAl, NaPZn, ZnP, AlSiTi
6 Chiron Anatetall Al(OH)3 FeAl, SZnBaAl
7 Chiron Morupar no /
8 GlaxoSmithKline- Belgium Mencevax ACWY no FeCrNi, ZrAl, FeCrNiZrAlSi
9 GlaxoSmithKline Infanrix Al(OH)3 Al, AlTi, AlSi
10 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals Infanrix hexa Al(OH)3 SBa, FeCu, SiAl, FeSi, CaMgSi, AlCaSi, Ti, Au, SCa, SiAlFeSnCuCrZn, CaAlSi
11 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals Infanrix hexa Al(OH)3 ,AlPO4. 2H2O W, FeCrNi, Ti
12 GlaxoSmithKline Typherix no Ti, TiW, AlSiTiWCr, SBa, W, SiAl, AlSiTi
13 GlaxoSmithKline Priorix no WCa, WFeCu, SiAl, SiMg, PbFe, Ti, WNiFe
14 GlaxoSmithKline Engerix-B no Al (precipitates)
15 GlaxoSmithKline Varilrix no FeZn, FeSi, AlSiFe, SiAlTiFe, MgSi, Ti, Zr, Bi
16 GlaxoSmithKline Fluarix no AlCu, Fe, AlBi, Si, SiZn, AlCuFe, SiMg, SBa, AlCuBi, FeCrNi, SPZn
17 GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals Cervarix Al(OH)3 AlSi,FeAl, SiMg,CaSiAl, CaZn, FeAlSi, FeCr, CuSnPb
18 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Anatetall Al(OH)3 Al, FeCrNi, AlCr, AlFe, BaS, ZnAl
19 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Dif-Tet-All Al(OH)3 Fe,SBa, SiSBa, AlZnCu, AlZnFeCr
20 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Menjugate kit Al(OH)3 SiAl,Ti,FeZn, Fe, Sb, SiAlFeTi, W, Zr
21 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Focetria no Fe, FeCrNiCu, FeCrNi, SiFeCrNi, Cr, SiAlFe, AlSiTiFe, AlSi, SiMgFe, Si, FeZn
22 Novartis Agrippal S1 no Ca, Fe, SBa, SBaZn, Cr, Si, Pb, Bi, e FeSiAlCr, SiAlSBaFe, CaAlSi, Zn, CeFeTiNi, FeCrNi
23 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Agrippal S1 no SiAlK, Si, SiMgFe, CaSiAl, SBaZn
24 Novartis vaccines Agrippal no Cr, Ca, SiCaAl, ZrSi, SBa, CuZn, SCa
25 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics S Fluad no CaSiAl, FeSiTi,SiMgAlFe, SBa
26 Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Menveo no CaSiAl, SiAlFe, FeCrNi, Fe, Al, SBa
27 Pfizer Prenevar 13 no FeCr
28 Pfizer Prevenar 13 no W, CaAlSi, Al, CaSiAlFe, FeS, FeCr, FeCrNi, Fe, , CaP, FeTiMn, Ba, SiMgAlFe
29 Pfizer Meningitec – ctrl no Cr, Si
30 Pfizer Meningitec – ctrl no FeCrNi, W
31 Pfizer Meningitec no CaSiAl, CaSi, SiAlFeTi, FeCrNi, W, Fe, Pb
32 Pfizer Meningitec no Cr (precipitates), Ca, AlSi
33 Pfizer Meningitec no W, SiCa, CaSi, Pb, FeCrNi, Cr
34 Wyeth Pharmaceutical – UK Meningitec no SiAlFe, SiAlTi, SiMgFe, W, Fe, Zr, Pb, Ca, Zn, FeCrNi
35 Sanofi Pasteur MSD-France Vaxigrip no Fe, FeCrNi, SiAlFe, AlSi, SiAlFeCr
36 Sanofi Pasteur MSD Stamaril Pasteur no CaSiAl, AlSi, Fe, SiMgFe, SiMgAlFe, CrSiFeCr, CrSiCuFe
37 Sanofi Pasteur MSD Gardasil AlPO4. 2H2O AlCuFe, PbBi, Pb, Bi, Fe
38 Sanifi Pasteur MSD Gardasil AlPO4. 2H2O CaAlSi, AlSi, SiMgFe, Al,Fe, AlCuFe, FeSiAl, BiBaS, Ti, TiAlSi
39 Sanofi Pasteur Vaxigrip no Ca, CrFe, FeCrNi, CaSZn, CaSiAlTiFe, Ag, Fe
40 Sanofi Pasteur Vaxigrip no SiMgFe, CaSiAl, AlSiFe, AlSi,FeCr, FeZn, Fe
41 Sanofi Pasteur MSD Repevax AlPO4 .2H2O Bi, Fe, AlSiFe, SiMg, SBa, Ca
42 Sanofi Pasteur MSD S Repevax AlPO4.2H2O Ti, Br, AuCuZn, Ca, SiZn, SiAuAgCu, SiMgFe,FeCrNi.AlSiMgTiMnCrFe, SiFeCrNi, FeAl
43 Sanofi Pasteur MSD M-M-R vaxPro no Si, SiFeCrNi, FeCrNi,FeNi, Fe, SCa, AlSiCa, CaAlSiFeV, SBa, Pt, PtAgBiFeCr
44 Virbac S.A. – Carros – France Feligen CRP no Ca,SiAl
Table 2: List of the vaccines according to their manufacturers with the chemical composition of the debris identified in each sample. The elements most represented are reported.


Figure 1a shows a layer of crystals of Sodium chloride (NaCl) embedding salts of Aluminum phosphate (AlPO4) in a drop of Gardasil (anti-HPV vaccine by Merck) as the EDS spectrum (Figure 1b) shows. Saline is the fluid base to any vaccine preparation and Aluminum salts or Aluminum hydroxide (Al(OH)3) are the adjuvants which are usually added.

Looking at the area outside these precipitates but inside the liquid drop, we identified other things: single particles, clusters of particles and aggregates (organic-inorganic composites) that are due to an interaction of the inorganic particulate matter with the organic part of the vaccine.

Figure 1: Crystals of saline solution and Aluminum Phosphate and corresponding EDS spectra.


Figure 2a-2f shows the different typology of entities identified in the vaccines (Repevax, Prevenar and Gardasil); single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (<100nm) and aggregates with their EDS spectra (Figure 2d-2f). The images (Figure 2a & 2d) show debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles (Figure 2b & 2e) arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum -Copper debris (Figure 2c & 2f) in an aggregate.

Figure 2: Images of single particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (<100nm) and aggregates with their EDS spectra. They are respectively composed of (a,b) Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium, Titanium, Chromium, Manganese, Iron, (c,d) Iron, Silicon, Calcium Titanium, Chromium, (e,f) Aluminum, Copper. The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.

As can be seen, the particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro).


Figure 3a-3d show particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).

Figure 3: Images of Tungsten particles identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix. They are composed respectively of Tungsten, Aluminum, Iron but in different concentrations. The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.


Figure 4a-4d present singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).

Figure 4: Images show examples of nano biointeraction. The aggregate (a,b) identified in Gardasil contains nanoparticles of Chlorine, Silicon, Aluminum, Zirconium, while the debris found in Repevax contains Silicon, Gold, Silver (c,d). The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.

Some metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix, Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron, Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1) were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a nano-bio-interaction [6] occurs and a “protein corona” is formed [7-10]. The nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized as self by the body.


Figure 5a-5f show examples of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec, (Figure 5a & 5b) of stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel, Figure 5c & 5d) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in Cervarix (Figure 5e & 5f). Similar aggregates, though in different situations (patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already been described in literature.

Figure 5: show particles surrounded by an organic compound. They are composed of Lead (a,b), Iron, Chromium, Nickel (stainless steel; c,d), Copper, Tin, Lead (e,f). The arrows show the points where EDS spectra were taken.

The link between these two entities generates an unfolding of the proteins that can induce an autoimmune effect once those proteins are injected into humans.


Figure 6a & 6b show one of the foreign bodies identified in Agrippal. The particle is composed of Cerium, Iron, Titanium and Nickel. Figure 7a & 7b present an area of Repevax where the morphology of red cells – we cannot tell whether they are human or animal- is clearly visible.

Figure 6: show an organic aggregate containing a debris made of Cerium, Iron, Nickel, Titanium. The red arrow indicates the organic layer (less atomically dense) that covers the Cerium particle.

Figure 7: Image of an area in a Repevax drop where the morphology of red cells (red arrows) were identified. It is impossible to know whether they are human or animal origin. Among the debris of saline and Aluminum phosphate, there is the presence of debris (white arrows) composed of Aluminum, Bromine, Silicon, Potassium, Titanium.


Table 3 summarizes the number and morphology of the debris identified, in term of single particles, clusters of particles or aggregates (organic-inorganic compounds), while Figure 8 shows the graph obtained calculating the total number of particles (particles plus clusters plus aggregates) identified for 20 microl of every vaccine.

Name Total Debris n. Size Range in mm Cluster n. Size Range in mm Aggregate n.(Range of Particles) Size Range mm
Allergoid NaCl precipitates / / / / /
Typhim Vi 394 0,1-2,5 3[9-350] 2-35
Tetabulin 519 0,1-15 3[100-180] 25-60
Vivotif Berna 4 1,5-15
Inflexal V 103 0,1-17 1 20 3[35-45] 10-25
Anatetall 2 1-3
Morupar / / /
Mencevax ACWY 13 0,2-5
Infanrix 3 1-5 1 25
Infanrix hexa 1821 0,1-15 15[1820] 20-140
Infanrix hexa 162 0,3-7 12 60 2[7 debris] 3.5-44
Typherix 8 0,2-8 1 15
Priorix 641 0,05-30 1 10 3[600] 20-70
Engerix-B precipitates /
Varilrix 2723 0,1-4 36 [120-2000] 15-40
Fluarix 1317 0,1-40 3[83] 7-30
Cervarix 1569 0,2-3 2 5-10 4[1400] 8-30
Anatetall 47 0,05-40
Dif-Tet-All 111 0,2-3
Menjugate 73 0,1-5
Focetria 35 0,7-10
Agrippal S1 430 0,2-6 13 0.2-80 5[410] 20
Agrippal S1 1029 0,1-12 9[1025] 35-80
Agrippal 480 0,1-6 11[ 460] 2-80
Fluad 605 0,2-15 4 12-25 6[ 600] 70
Menveo 452 0,1-13 4[430 ] 30-110
Prenevar 13 precipitates + 5 debris 1-7
Prevenar 13 precipitates + 81 debris 0,2-50 3 5-40 1 [60] 25
Meningitec 3 10-20
Meningitec 24 8-60
Meningitec 673 0,1-20 1 7 9[624] 5-110
Meningitec precipitates + 40 0,1-3,5 2[40] 25-70
Meningitec 177 0,2-10 3[165] 15-100
Meningitec 241 0,1-15 1 50 2[230] 50
Vaxigrip 86 0,1-7 2[50] 2-2,5
Stamaril Pasteur 152 0,1-7 2 5-7 3[145] 4-20
Gardasil 304 0,05-3 1[300] 15
Gardasil 454 0.1-30 2 7-20 9[445] 5-60
Vaxigrip 304 0,1-10 1 13 2[300] 35
Vaxigrip 674 0,3-25 2 2-12 10[660] 9-150
Repevax 137 0,1-20 2[130] 40-50
Repevax 214 0,1-10 6[150] 5-30
M-M-R vaxPro 93 0,1-15 2[50] Oct-15
Feligen CRP 92 0,1-12 1 12 1 (40 debris) 25

Table 3: List of the debris’ number identified in each vaccine as single particle, clusters and aggregates. Characterization is made by shape, size range and variability of the number of particles counted in each aggregate [in brackets].

Figure 8: Graph of the debris’ quantities identified in a 20 microl drop of every vaccine.

Similar aggregates were already described by other scientists who identified them in the blood e.g. in leukemic patients [15] and in subjects affected by cryoglobulinemia [16].

Not all the vaccines analyzed contain the same contamination, though the same vaccine belonging to different batches and, in some cases, coming from different countries can contain a similar contamination (e.g. the vaccines by Glaxo Infarix, Typherix and Priorix contain Tungsten. Tungsten was also identified in Menjugate kit by Novartis, and Prevenar, Meningitec by Pfizer and Meningitec by Wyeth).]

Feligen, the only veterinary vaccine tested, proved to be the only sample free from inorganic contamination, while Allergoid generates a layer of inorganic salts so thick that it does not allow to detect other particulate contaminants.


The quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that toxicity which, in any case, is still there, that typical of foreign bodies. For that reason, they induce an inflammatory reaction.

After being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas [17]. But they can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to guess what will be their final destination. We believe that in many cases they get distributed throughout the body without causing any visible reaction, but it is also likely that, in some circumstances, they reach some organ, none excluded and including the microbiota, in a fair quantity. As happens with all foreign bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded. Furthermore, the protein-corona effect (due to a nano-bio-interaction [18]) can produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way [19-22]. It is impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA [23].

In some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues [24-26].

The detection of presence of Aluminum and NaCl salts is obvious as they are substances used by the Producers and declared as components, but other materials are not supposed to be in the vaccine or in any other injectable drug, at that, and, in any case, Aluminum has already been linked with neurological diseases [27-29].

Given the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines, adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their presence in the muscles, due an extravasation from the blood, could heavily impair the muscle functionality [30,31].

We come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants.

Other forms of so-far unknown contaminations have recently been observed and, in any case, vaccines contain components that could themselves be the cause of adverse effects. It is a well-known fact in toxicology that contaminants exert a mutual, synergic effect, and as the number of contaminants increases, the effects grow less and less predictable. The more so when some substances are unknown.

As a matter of fact, no exhaustive and reliable official data exist on the side-effects induced by vaccines. The episodic evidence reported by people allegedly damaged by vaccines is twofold: some say the damage occurred and became visible within a few hours from administration, and some maintain that it was a matter of some weeks. Though we have no indisputable evidence as to the reliability of those attestations, we can put forward a hypothesis to explain the different phenomena. In the former case, the pollutants contained in the drug have reached the brain and, depending on the anatomical site interested, have induced a reaction. If that is the case, the whole phenomenon is very rapid. In the latter circumstance, the pollutants reached the microbiota, thus interfering with the production of enzymes necessary to carry out neurological functions [32-35]. That possibility takes time, as it involves the production of chemical compounds in a sufficient quantity, and an elapse of some weeks between injection and clinical evidence is reasonable. Of course, ours is no more than a hypothesis open to discussion and in need of proof, hoping that a chance of further investigation is allowed.


The analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case. This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used to produce vaccines, not investigated and not detected by the Producers. If our hypothesis is actually the case, a close inspection of the working places and the full knowledge of the whole procedure of vaccine preparation would probably allow to eliminate the problem.

A further purification of the vaccines could improve their quality and could probably decrease the number and seriousness of the adverse incidental effects.


The Authors are indebted to Dr. Federico Capitani, Dr. Laura Valentini and Ms. Lavinia Nitu for their technical assistance. The opinions and conclusions are not necessarily those of the Institution.


  1. Healthy Children.org
  2. US Dpt of health and human services (1996) Report Update: Vaccine Side Effects, Adverse Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions. CDC 45(RR-12): 1-35.
  3. Ottaviani G, Lavezzi AM, Matturri L (2006) Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) shortly after hexavalent vaccination: pathology in suspected SIDS? Virchows Arch 448(1): 100-104.
  4. Taylor B, Miller E, Farrington CP, Petropoulos MC, Favot-Mayaud I, et al. (1999) Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: no epidemiological evidence for a causal association. Lancet 353(9169): 2026-2029.
  5. Demicheli V, Rivetti A, Debalini MG, Di Pietrantonj C (2012) Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 15(2): CD004407.
  6. Carola Bardage, Ingemar Persson, Åke Örtqvist, Ulf Bergman, Jonas F Ludvigsson, et al. (2011) Neurological and autoimmune disorders after vaccination against pandemic influenza A (H1N1) with a monovalent adjuvanted vaccine: population based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden. BMJ 343: d5956.
  7. Johann Liang R (2012) Updating the Vaccine Injury Table following the 2011 IOM Report on Adverse Effects of vaccines. HRSA, pp. 1-27.
  8. L Tomljenovic, CA Shaw (2011) Aluminum Vaccine Adjuvants: Are they Safe? Current Medicinal Chemistry 18(17): 2630-2637.
  9. Shaw CA, Petrik MS (2009) Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem 103(11): 1555-1562.
  10. Authier FJ, Sauvat S, Christov C, Chariot P, Raisbeck G, et al. (2006) AlOH3-adjuvanted vaccine-induced macrophagic myofasciitis in rats is influenced by the genetic background. Neuromuscul Disord 16(5): 347-352.
  11. Exley C, Esiri MM (2006) Severe cerebral congophilic angiopathy coincident with increased brain aluminium in a resident of Camelford, Cornwall, UK. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 77(7): 877-879.
  12. Wills MR, Savory J (1985) Water content of aluminium, dialysis dementia, and osteomalacia. Environ Health Perspect 63: 141-147.
  13. Brinth L, Pors K, Theibel AC, Mehlsen J (2015) Suspected side effects to the quadrivalent human papilloma vaccine. Danish Medical J 62(4): 1-12.
  14. Palmieri B, Poddighe D, Vadalà M, Laurino C, Carnovale C, et al. (2016) Severe somatoform and dysautonomic syndromes after HPV vaccination: case series and review of literature. Immunol Res.
  15. Visani G, Manti A, Valentini L, Canonico B, Loscocco F, et al. (2016) Environmental nanoparticles are significantly over-expressed in acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res 50: 50-56.
  16. Artoni E, Sighinolfi GL, Gatti AM, Sebastiani M, Colaci M, et al. (2016) Micro and nanoparticles as possible pathogenetic co-factors in mixed cryoglobulinemia. Occupational Medicine.
  17. T Hansen, L Klimek, F Bittinger, I Hansen, A Gatti, et al. (2008) Mast cell reiches Aluminium granuloma Pathologe 29(4): 311-313.
  18. Gatti AM, Manti A, Valentini L, Montanari S, Gobbi P, et al. (2016) Nano biointeraction of particulate matter in the blood circulation. Frontiers 30: 3.
  19. Tenzer S, Docter D, Rosfa S, Wlodarski A, Kuharev J, et al. (2011) Nanoparticle size is a critical physicochemical determinant of the human blood plasma corona: a comprehensive quantitative proteomic analysis. ACS Nano 5(9): 7155-167.
  20. Radauer Preiml , Andosch A, Hawranek T, Luetz-Meindl U, Wiederstein M, et al. (2015) Nanoparticle-allergen interactions mediate human allergic responses: protein corona characterization and cellular responses. Fibre toxicology 13: 3.
  21. Cedervall T, Lynch I, Lindman S, Berggård T, Thulin E, et al. (2016) Understanding the nanoparticle-protein corona using methods to quantify exchange rates and affinities of proteins for nanoparticles. PNAS 104 (7): 2050-2055.
  22. Lynch I, Cedervall T, Lundqvist M, Cabaleiro-Lago C, Linse S, et al. (2007) The nanoparticle-protein complex as a biological entity; a complex fluids and surface science challenge for the 21st century. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 134-135: 167-174.
  23. Gatti AM, Quaglino D, Sighinolfi GL (2009) A Morphological Approach to Monitor the Nanoparticle-Cell Interaction. International Journal of Imaging and Robotics 2: 2-21.
  24. Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Galante JO (1994) Migration of corrosion products from modular hip prostheses. Particle microanalysis and histopathological findings. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 76(9): 1345-1359.
  25. Kirkpatrick CJ, Barth S, Gerdes T, Krump-Konvalinkova V, Peters (K 2002) Pathomechanisms of impaired wound healing by metallic corrosion products. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 6(3): 183-190.
  26. Lee SH, Brennan FR, Jacobs JJ, Urban RM, Ragasa DR, et al. (1997) Human monocyte/macrophage response to cobalt-chromium corrosion products and titanium particles in patients with total joint replacements. J Orthop Res 15(1): 40-49.
  27. Shaw CA, Seneff S, Kette SD, Tomljenovic L, Oller Jr JW, et al. (2014) Aluminum-Induced Entropy in Biological Systems: Implications for Neurological Disease. Journal of Toxicology 2014: 491316.
  28. Shaw CA, Kette SD, Davidson RM, Seneff S (2013) Aluminum™s Role in CNS-immune System Interactions leading to Neurological Disorders. Immunome Research 9: 069.
  29. Seneff S, Swanson N, Chen Li (2015) Aluminum and Glyphosate Can Synergistically Induce Pineal Gland Pathology: Connection to Gut Dysbiosis and Neurological Disease. Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 42-70.
  30. Pegaz B, Debefve E, Ballini JP, Konan-Kouakou YN, van den Bergh HJ (2006) Effect of nanoparticle size on the extravasations and the photothrombic activity of meso(p-tetracarboxyphenyl)porphyrin. J Photochem Photobiol B 85(3): 216-222.
  31. Brinth LS, Pors K, Hoppe AG, Badreldin I, Mehlsen J (2015) Is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis a Relevant Diagnosis in Patients with Suspected Side Effects to Human Papilloma Virus Vaccine? International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccination 1(1):1-5.
  32. Moos WH, Faller DV, Harpp DN, Kanara I, Pernokas J, et al. (2016) Microbiota and Neurological Disorders: A Gut Feeling. Biores Open Access 5(1): 137-145.
  33. Sekirov I, Russell SL, Caetano L, Antunes M, Brett (2010) Gut Microbiota in Health and Disease. Physiological Rev 90(3): 859-904.
  34. Umbrello G, Esposito S (2016) Microbiota and neurologic diseases: potential effects of probiotics. J Transl Med 14(1): 298.
  35. Kinoshita T, Abe RT, Hineno A, Tsunekawa K, Nakane S, et al. (2014) Peripheral sympathetic nerve dysfunction in adolescent Japanese girls following immunization with the human papillomavirus vaccine. Intern Med 53(19): 2185-2200.

Creative Commons Attribution License©2017 Gatti, et al . This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and build upon your work non-commercially.
Print Friendly, PDF & Email