The COVID-19 PCR-Test – A Shot of Nanoparticles for Your Brain?

DeutschFrançais – To see this article in another language, please open the German version and use Machine Translation (on the right or in the footer).

Table of contents

  1. Summary
  2. The Covid-19 PCR Test – A Shot of Nanoparticles for Your Brain?
  3. Masks Do Not Stop the Virus
  4. Masks Make Us Sick and Demented
  5. Operation Moonshot: A Shot of Nanoparticles for Everybody’s Brain – What Do the Leaked Documents Say?
  6. What Are the Effects of These Nanoparticles In Your Brain?
  7. Corona Quarantine Camps in Canada, Switzerland, Germany and Many Other Western Countries
  8. Swiss Army Chief Paralyzes Army to Recruit and Arm Foreigners
  9. Why many COVID-19 vaccinated people will die months after the mRNA-injection
  10. Corona and the Ten Stages of Genocide by Dr. Gregory H. Stanton, President of Genocide Watch

1) Summary

The COVID-19 “vaccines” contain nanoparticles.

Based on whistleblower tips and various indications, the author is investigating with a group of physicians and policy makers whether the PCR swabs also inject nanoparticles into the brains of the tested persons when the samples for the Covid-19 PCR test are being taken.

An important indication is the loss of the sense of smell. Nanoparticles are known to harm the sense of smell: “Nanoparticles damage blood vessels, among other things. These ultra-small molecules impair the ability to smell. They can even mess with learning and memory. Brains exposed to nanoparticles develop abnormal features similar to those found in people with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases. And that has scientists worried. New data have begun showing how nanoparticles can pollute our brains. Especially alarming, some can make a beeline directly through the nose and into our thought centers“. The loss of the olfactory sense usually occurs after the COVID-19 PCR test. Pending laboratory testing will provide clarity.

We invite you to cooperate with us: please procure PCR test material from various test centers in your country and abroad. Doctors who perform PCR tests are appropriate contact persons. Take the swabs to independent laboratories and have them examined to see if the tips of the swabs are coated with nanoparticles. Please document the examination procedure and the results of your laboratory examination with court admissible evidence: laboratory documents, photos, videos and credible witnesses (laboratory technicians, doctors, police officers acting as private individuals, etc.).

Please send us your laboratory documents with the test results: Contact. If the laboratory analyses confirm that the tips of the swabs are contaminated with nanoparticles, we can activate the honest members of the judiciary – and for their protection the constitutionalists in the military.

Update April 20, 2021 – Italian scientists confirm: The PCR test swabs are contaminated with micro- and nanoparticles

Experimental physicist and biomaterials researcher Prof. Antonietta Gatti examined PCR test swabs under the electron microscope and analyzed their composition. The result: The swabs are made of hard materials and contain a large number of undeclared micro- and nano-particles of silver, aluminum, titanium, glass fibers, etc., which act like asbestos in the bodies of the test victims.

In this April 28, 2021 interview with Simon Yanowitz from Israel, Prof. Gatti talks about the micro and nano particles she has found in face masks, PCR test swabs and “vaccines”:

2) The Covid-19 PCR Test – A Shot of Nanoparticles for Your Brain?

The German science magazine Quarks confirms in this article: “mRNA-“vaccines” offer many advantages. The physicians would not necessarily have to inject the “vaccine”. Most mRNA-“vaccines” are directly nasally administered. This seems to make sense, since many infections start in the upper mucous membranes“. Has the military considered the possible consequences of such a scenario?

The journalist Candice Vacle (Reseau International, Investig’Action et Mediapart) drew the author’s attention to the work of Dr. Alexandra Henrion-Caude, a french geneticist. Dr. Henrion-Caude was director of the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) in Paris. The Inserm research and development institution is under the authority of the Ministère de la Santé (Ministry of Health) and the Ministère de la Recherche (Ministry of Research) of the French Republic.

Dr. Henrion-Caude explains in the video from minute 33:16 to 37:35 that the swab used for a PCR test is inserted into the nasopharynx in order to extract cells from the ethmoid by rubbing. The ethmoid contains the thin, sensitive, fragile cribriform plate. This plate is perforated with fine holes. These holes are traversed by nerve cells (neurons) of the olfactory nerve. Thus the cribriform plate can be targeted to deliver nanoparticulated drugs and “vaccines” directly to the brain. The tip of the swab coated with nanoparticles hits exactly the right spot so that the nanoparticles can reach the inside of the brain.

If the virus SARS-CoV-2 is able to penetrate masks and spread over distances of up to 5 feet / 1.5 meters (see point 3), why does a swab have to be inserted through the nose about 2 inches / 5 cm deep into the nasopharynx to take the cell sample for the PCR test? Because the swabs inject nanoparticles into the brain of the test victims?

France’s Haute Autorité de Santé (Health Authority, HAS) recommends saliva samples as an alternative – but only for test subjects who show symptoms. The HAS also recommends oral swabs (oropharyngeal swabs) for RT-PCR testing in asymptomatic individuals where nasopharyngeal swabs are contraindicated.

If SARS-CoV-2 is as easily transmitted as WHO and its affiliated health authorities claim, what is the point of the misleading distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic? This distinction has never been made in the history of medicine. It is an invention of the test manufacturers and the makers of the pandemic. It would be much less intrusive, easier and safer to collect saliva from the tongue and cells from the inside of the cheek. However, if you want to inject nanoparticles into the brain via the nasopharynx, you need a pretext. Independent laboratory tests of the swabs can quickly provide clarity here.

Update March 25, 2021 – The tips of many PCR swabs are contaminated with carcinogenic ethylene oxide

The tips of many PCR swabs are prepared with extremely carcinogenic ethylene oxide (EO).

Studies like the cohort study of mortality and cancer incidence in ethylene oxide production workers provide evidence for the toxicity and dangerousity of EO.

The “vaccine” manufacturers and their henchmen in politics, government agencies, academia and the media will falsely claim that a “malignantly mutated” SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the mass cancers and tumors. The victims of the mRNA-injections, PCR-tests and mandatory masks will then be transformed into “COVID-19 deaths” by more PCR-testing and used as justification for mandatory mass testing, mass mRNA-injections, and mass deportations to internment camps.

Update March 24, 2021 – Masks and PCR test swabs are contaminated with Morgellons microfibers

  • Update March 24, 2021: Microscopic small black threads are worked into the tips of these Chinese PCR swabs. What is this? What is it for?
  • Translation => Options (gear wheel) > Subtitles > Automatic translation > English

3) Masks Do Not Stop the Virus

Have the WHO, the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health and the Swiss Minister of Health Alain Berset sufficiently investigated and weighed up the risks and side effects of the obligation to wear masks? The WHO, America’s Dr. Fauchi, Dr. Daniel Koch (Switzerland’s Fauchi), and Prof. Christian Drosten (Germany’s Fauchi) have all made clear statements on the lack of benefit: “With a mask, the virus cannot be stopped“.

And since many citizens do not wear the masks correctly in everyday life, this can increase the risk of self-contamination. The WHO writes on June 5, 2020, page 8 (source) : “The disadvantages of masks worn by healthy people in public include the potentially increased risk of self-contamination from handling a face mask and subsequent contact of the eyes with contaminated hands“.

With regards to non-medical masks worn by citizens on a daily basis the WHO writes on June 5, 2020, page 8 (source) : “A non-medical mask is neither a medical disposable nor personal protective equipment“. In any case, almost nobody wears the mask correctly – not even our politicians in front of the camera.

Dr. Eric Loridan, surgeon in Boulogne-sur-Mer, Pas-De-Calais, France: “If a study shows that the mask helps to limit infections, please tell me, thank you!

Finally, surgical areas are oxygen enriched environments. Increased oxygen concentration allows surgeons to wear masks for longer periods of time.

4) Masks Make Us Sick and Demented

Those who want to advance the economic war of billionaire tycoons against the world’s middle class with even tougher Corona measures need as many sick, mentally damaged and dead people as possible. Masks make us sick and demented!

Dr Margareta Griesz-Brisson MD, PhD, is one of Europe’s leading consultant neurologists who is based on Harley Street in London. She is the Medical Director of The London Neurology & Pain Clinic, where she currently sees patients.

Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson strongly criticizes the obligation to wear a mask and the rules of distance: “Oxygen deprivation causes irreversible neurological damage“. Such coercion is “inhuman and criminal“. She warns of the serious consequences that would result from the compulsory wearing of masks – especially for children and young people.

And the WHOtube censorship award for the most important video on the dangers of masks goes to … Dr. Margareta Griesz-Brisson! ReUpload:

5) Operation Moonshot: A Shot of Nanoparticles for Everybody’s Brain – What Do the Leaked Documents Say?

11.09.2020 – British Medical Journal (BMJ)Operation Moonshot is the name of the new mass testing program for Covid-19 proposed by the British government. The plan uncovered by the BMJ envisages an expansion of testing from currently hundreds of thousands of tests per day to 10 million per day by early 2021. But how does the government intend to achieve this?

Operation Moonshot is a global project targeting all nations of the world. On November 15, 2020, Austrias Federal Chancellor Sebastian Kurz surprised the public with a new Corona plan: Austria would conduct a large scale Covid-19 test campaign using a combination of unreliable PCR tests and even less reliable rapid tests. The Chancellor wants to test the whole population. He is in close contact with Slovakia, where the entire population has been tested. “This was a demonstration of strength,” said Kurz. Tens of thousands of soldiers were involved. The “infected” people (the majority of whom tested false positive) were sent into “temporary quarantine” and thus “removed from circulation”.

6) What Are the Effects of These Nanoparticles In Your Brain?

Let us assume that the injection of nanoparticles into the brain of PCR test victims would be part of a nanotechnological weapon system – activatable e.g. by irradiating the nanoparticles with 5G microwaves.

How would we as a society react if the tested victims fall ill and die en masse – while the attacker lets us explain via his controlled media: “Red alert! SARS-CoV-2 has mutated into a killer virus!”

WHO Executive Director Mike Ryan, responsible for the WHO Health Emergency Management Program: “We may have to enter homes and remove members of your families”, presumalby by force.

Swiss Covid-19 Law Article 5 Measures relating to foreign nationals and asylum : The WHO, via the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health, can order the Swiss Federal Council (Swiss Epidemics Act Art. 80) to introduce derogations from the Foreign Nationals and Integration Act (FNIA) and from the Asylum Act (AsylA) on: a. restricting the entry of foreign nationals – mercenaries – and their admission to stay in Switzerland.

From the point of view of the opposing campaign leadership, it is obvious to present the technology for the activation of injected nanoparticles as part of the Covid-19 “Protection Concept”. The activation can be done, for example, via Covid-19 “Screening Gates”. In its Corona Lock Step Scenario 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation had already planned “body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets” (see page 19).

7) Corona Quarantine Camps in Canada, Switzerland, Germany and Many Other Western Countries

Let us be vigilant! This information reminds us of the darkest hours in history: 1.3 million deportees ended up in the Auschwitz extermination camp. Only gullible people believe that torture and extermination camps like the one in Abu Ghraib can only exist in evil Iraq, but never in Europe and America. To believe that we are above these things is a lack of humility – and pride comes before a fall. Or as firefighters are like to say: There is a fire even among those who believe that fire is only among others.

Do the Corona measures divide our society into victims of tests & mRNA-injections – and interned dissidents?

What will YOU do when members of our families and communities are transported by train to quarantine camps? And this only because of false positive PCR and rapid tests?

Canada

The Canadian government is setting up a network of quarantine and internment camps. Randy Hillier, an independent member of parliament for the province of Ontario, sounded the alarm on October 8, 2020: The neoliberal Trudeau government plans to expand the isolation and quarantine camps from the Pacific to the Atlantic.

Randy Hillier stood up and asked the government of Doug Ford in Ontario how many concentration camps are to be built and how many people are to be imprisoned. He expressed concern about their current use – to contain the spread of Covid-19 – and quoted from the documents that the camps could be used for “other purposes” in the future.

Hillier explained: “Your government must therefore be in negotiations and aware of these plans to intern and possibly isolate citizens and residents of Canada and the province of Ontario. So, Mr. Speaker and Prime Minister, where will these camps be built? How many people will be detained? For what reasons can people be detained in these isolation camps? I want the Prime Minister to assure the people of Ontario… ” At this point Hillier’s microphone was switched off!

Switzerland

Here the key occult scene of the opening ceremony of the Gotthard Base Tunnel on June 1, 2016 in full length. Please note the admission of the Guantánamo prisoners in orange uniformes from 1m:11s, the space-saving accommodation of the prisoners under the tunnel ceiling from 6m:40s and the panic of the newly admitted prisoners from 6m:58s. The childlike being that flies out of the railroad car at 8m:55s is a bad omen: Does it symbolize the dehumanization – the departure of the souls – and thus the near end of the detainees? Does the chain-swinging train attendant in the supply wagon from 10m:12s ensure good discipline for the new arrivals?

This infernal choreography was presented to the public as a “work of art”. That is no proof. But it raises questions and makes people wonder. Does this infernal show announce our internment? This Gotthard desecration was attended by German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi, French President François Hollande and the President of Swiss Government, Johann Schneider-Ammann. The presence of these high-ranking state representatives underlines the political dimension of the event. And the closure of the airspace suggests that even more influential people were present.

Germany – Do we want to know this time where the trains are going?

Other Countries

8) Swiss Army Chief Paralyzes Army to Recruit and Arm Foreigners

03.11.2020 – Weltwoche – Swiss Armed Forces in Intensive Care – Military refresher courses and recruitment have been discontinued, but foreigners (mercenaries) are to serve in the future. What is going on with the Swiss Army? What is happening in the armies of other countries?

In recent months, the Swiss Army has been a guarantor for headlines. Unfortunately, they were not only positive. The positive Covid-19 test of Swiss Army chief Thomas Süssli makes one wonder. Until recently he commanded from isolation. Did the army chief, during this time, receive instructions on how the army should transport categories of the Swiss population to quarantine camps? The same question arises in the case of Jean-Philippe Gaudin, head of the Federal Intelligence Service, who has also been tested Covid-19 positive.

Commander Süssli swears by modern communication methods. Nevertheless, there were annoying slip-ups. In the daily newspaper Blick, he complained about a shortage of 30,000 Swiss militia soldiers in the near future. On the very day of a media conference on the new fighter jets with Defense Minister Viola Amherd, army chief Süssli suggested in the newspaper Tagesanzeiger that in the future foreigners (mercenaries) should be admitted to the army. Mainstream journalists welcomed Süssli’s vision, which clearly contradicts the Swiss Constitution.

The constantly smiling army chief, as a representative of the non-combatant medical forces, has remained an exotic among the generals. He calls himself a “philanthropist”. Süssli’s military decisions are less harmless: he has cancelled all refresher courses until the end of the year 2020 – supposedly because of Corona. So there are no regular troops on duty that could be called up at short notice in a crisis. Until recently, care was taken to ensure that at least one battalion was permanently on duty. Imagine what would have happened to Switzerland if the army had holed up at home during the general strike of November 1918 because of the Spanish flu pandemic.

Watch out! It is extremely dangerous to paralyze the entire Swiss Army and at the same time to arm foreigners in Switzerland – especially if the army chief is arming foreign mercenaries who have been imported / infiltrated into Switzerland disguised as refugees. What if these mercenaries are ordered to forcibly enter our homes to remove members of our families (children, women, dissidents) and deport them by train to quarantine and internment camps? Check and mate!

9) Why many COVID-19 vaccinated people will die months after the mRNA-injection

Update April 26, 2021 – Five Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to Do About It!

Dr Vernon Coleman: Covid-19 mRNA-Injections Are Weapons of Mass Destruction and Could Wipe Out Humanity

Update March 13, 2021 – Dr Vernon Coleman: The Corona injections ARE the pandemic. Not the virus, but the Corona injections will cause a deadly pandemic!

The “vaccine” manufacturers and their henchmen in politics, government agencies, academia and the media will falsely claim that a “malignantly mutated” SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the mass cancers and tumors. The victims of the mRNA-injections, PCR-tests and mandatory masks will then be transformed into “COVID-19 deaths” by more PCR-testing and used as justification for mandatory mass testing, mass mRNA-injections, and mass deportations to internment camps.

Update January 15, 2021 – Dr Gold exposes the truth: the mRNA-injections are NOT vaccines!

Dr Simone Gold of America’s Frontline Doctors confirms the warnings by Professor Dolores Cahill and Dr Alexandra Henrion-Caude. She is a Medical Doctor (MD) and a Juris Doctor (JD):

Update December 14, 2020 – Prof. Dolores Cahill, Immunologist : Why many COVID-19 vaccinated people will die months after the mRNA-injection

In the video Irish immunologist and molecular biologist Prof. Dr. Dolores Chahill uses the study “Immunization with SARS Coronavirus “Vaccines” Leads to Pulmonary Immunopathology on Challenge with the SARS Virus” to explain why mRNA-injections are associated with extreme risks.

When vaccinated individuals come into contact with wild coronavirus several months after mRNA-injection, in many cases, their immune systems will respond with a fatal cytokine storm. This because the mRNA vaccine genetically modifies thier bodies cells to produce the coronavirus spike protein. When a new coronavirus later activates their immune system, it recognizes the self-produced spike proteins in the cells as a threat and launches a major attack against the body’s own cells. As a result, the vaccinated suffer a septic shock with multiple organ failure, which usually ends in death.

Alexandra Henrion-Caude, MD, a French geneticist and former director of the National Institute of Health and Medical Research (Inserm) demands: The public must be educated about the life-threatening risks of mRNA-“vaccines” for seniors before injection.

She refers to the conclusions from the study “Informed consent disclosure to “vaccine” trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 “vaccines” worsening clinical disease” and its clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of COVID-19 antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in “vaccine” trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after “vaccine” approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

mRNA-injections do not protect against coronaviruses, but make them a deadly threat! Thus, it is necessary to clarify whether the term “vaccine” conceals a biological weapon system. In any case, the vaccine manufacturers, the WHO and their offshoots in the national authorities will try to blame the side effects (from a military point of view: main effects) of the mRNA-injection on a “mutated virus”.

The makers of the pandemic will reinterpret those who died as a result of mRNA-injection as “COVID-21 deaths”. This must be prevented by autopsies – because the mRNA-injection victims are to serve them as justification for severe measures as well as for an extreme mass panic, which they know how to stir up via the mass media. Their goal – to maximize the number of deaths through mandatory mRNA-injections – becomes apparent in all its unscrupulousness.

At the same time, it is strategically important for the makers of the pandemic to eliminate the control group of the unvaccinated – and to do so as quickly as possible. Otherwise, it would soon become apparent that only the mRNA-injected are dying. Therefore, all those who do not accept the highly risky mRNA-injections are to be stigmatized as “a threat to public health” so as to provide the pretext for their isolation and deportation to quarantine camps. How can the unvaccinated pose a threat to the vaccinated, if the later are protected by the mRNA-injection?

Now it becomes clear why, in June 2020, Bill Gates announced with a sardonic grin: “The next virus will get attention” – and why, on 30 March 2020, WHO’s Executive Director Micheal Ryan, responsible for the WHO Health “Emergency” Management Program, announced mass deportations to quarantine camps: “We may have to enter homes and remove members of your families“, presumalby by force.

This investigation shall clarify whether mass PCR testing is also being used to eliminate the unvaccinated as a control group (see point 1).

The author has been warning about this military scenario since 2013. The mRNA-injection IS the pandemic! If we use the remaining window of opportunity, we can counter this attack against the population.

10) Corona and the Ten Stages of Genocide by Dr. Gregory H. Stanton, President of Genocide Watch

Update January 19, 2021 – The Ten Stages of Genocide (2016) by Dr. Gregory H. Stanton, President Genocide Watch; Research Professor in Genocide Studies and Prevention, School for Conflict Analysis and Resolution, George Mason University, Arlington, Virginia 22201, USA.

If you prefer listening to reading: In this video, Henna Maria from Dawn of Peace presents a 28-minutes summary of Dr Stanton’s work. She is an activist, speaker, writer, and practitioner of sacred healing arts, which she learned with the Shipibo tribe in the Amazon rainforest.

Genocide is a process that develops in ten stages that are predictable but not inexorable. At each stage, preventive measures can stop it. The process is not linear. Stages may occur simultaneously. Logically, later stages must be preceded by earlier stages. But all stages continue to operate throughout the process.

1. CLASSIFICATION: All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality: German and Jew, Hutu and Tutsi. Bipolar societies that lack mixed categories, such as Rwanda and Burundi, are the most likely to have genocide.

The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend ethnic or racial divisions, that actively promote tolerance and understanding, and that promote classifications that transcend the divisions. The Roman Catholic Church could have played this role in Rwanda, had it not been riven by the same ethnic cleavages as Rwandan society. Promotion of a common language in countries like Tanzania has also promoted transcendent national identity. This search for common ground is vital to early prevention of genocide.

2. SYMBOLIZATION: We give names or other symbols to the classifications. We name people “Jews” or “Gypsies,” or distinguish them by colors or dress; and apply the symbols to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to dehumanization. When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups: the yellow star for Jews under Nazi rule, the blue scarf for people from the Eastern Zone in Khmer Rouge Cambodia.

To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden (swastikas in Germany) as can hate speech. Group marking like gang clothing or tribal scarring can be outlawed, as well. The problem is that legal limitations will fail if unsupported by popular cultural enforcement. Though Hutu and Tutsi were forbidden words in Burundi until the 1980’s, code words replaced them. If widely supported, however, denial of symbolization can be powerful, as it was in Bulgaria, where the government refused to supply enough yellow badges and at least eighty percent of Jews did not wear them, depriving the yellow star of its significance as a Nazi symbol for Jews.

3. DISCRIMINATION: A dominant group uses law, custom, and political power to deny the rights of other groups. The powerless group may not be accorded full civil rights, voting rights, or even citizenship. The dominant group is driven by an exclusionary ideology that would deprive less powerful groups of their rights. The ideology advocates monopolization or expansion of power by the dominant group. It legitimizes the victimization of weaker groups. Advocates of exclusionary ideologies are often charismatic, expressing resentments of their followers, attracting support from the masses. Examples include the Nuremberg Laws of 1935 in Nazi Germany, which stripped Jews of their German citizenship, and prohibited their employment by the government and by universities. Denial of citizenship to the Rohingya Muslim minority in Burma is a current example.

Prevention against discrimination means full political empowerment and citizenship rights for all groups in a society. Discrimination on the basis of nationality, ethnicity, race or relign should be outlawed. Individuals should have the right to sue the state, corporations, and other individuals if their rights are violated.

4. DEHUMANIZATION: One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases. Dehumanization overcomes the normal human revulsion against murder. At this stage, hate propaganda in print and on hate radios is used to vilify the victim group. The majority group is taught to regard the other group as less than human, and even alien to their society. They are indoctrinated to believe that “We are better off without them.” The powerless group can become so depersonalized that they are actually given numbers rather than names, as Jews were in the death camps. They are equated with filth, impurity, and immorality. Hate speech fills the propaganda of official radio, newspapers, and speeches.

To combat dehumanization, incitement to genocide should not be confused with protected speech. Genocidal societies lack constitutional protection for countervailing speech, and should be treated differently than democracies. Local and international leaders should condemn the use of hate speech and make it culturally unacceptable. Leaders who incite genocide should be banned from international travel and have their foreign finances frozen. Hate radio stations should be jammed or shut down, and hate propaganda banned. Hate crimes and atrocities should be promptly punished.

5. ORGANIZATION: Genocide is always organized, usually by the state, often using militias to provide deniability of state responsibility. (An example is the Sudanese government’s support and arming of the Janjaweed in Darfur.) Sometimes organization is informal (Hindu mobs led by local RSS militants during Indian partition) or decentralized (jihadist terrorist groups.) Special army units or militias are often trained and armed. Arms are purchased by states and militias, often in violation of UN Arms Embargos, to facilitate acts of genocide. States organize secret police to spy on, arrest, torture, and murder people suspected of opposition to political leaders. Special training is given to murderous militias and special army killing units.

To combat this stage, membership in genocidal militias should be outlawed. Their leaders should be denied visas for foreign travel and their foreign assets frozen. The UN should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations, as was done in post-genocide Rwanda, and use national legal systems to prosecute those who violate such embargos.

6. POLARIZATION: Extremists drive the groups apart. Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda. Motivations for targeting a group are indoctrinated through mass media. Laws may forbid intermarriage or social interaction. Extremist terrorism targets moderates, intimidating and silencing the center. Moderates from the perpetrators’ own group are most able to stop genocide, so are the first to be arrested and killed. Leaders in targeted groups are the next to be arrested and murdered. The dominant group passes emergency laws or decrees that grants them total power over the targeted group. The laws erode fundamental civil rights and liberties. Targeted groups are disarmed to make them incapable of self-defense, and to ensure that the dominant group has total control.

Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups. Assets of extremists may be seized, and visas for international travel denied to them. Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions. Vigorous objections should be raised to disarmament of opposition groups. If necessary they should be armed to defend themselves.

7. PREPARATION: Plans are made for genocidal killings. National or perpetrator group leaders plan the “Final Solution” to the Jewish, Armenian, Tutsi or other targeted group “question.” They often use euphemisms to cloak their intentions, such as referring to their goals as “ethnic cleansing,” “purification,” or “counter-terrorism.” They build armies, buy weapons and train their troops and militias. They indoctrinate the populace with fear of the victim group. Leaders often claim that “if we don’t kill them, they will kill us,” disguising genocide as self-defense. Acts of genocide are disguised as counter-insurgency if there is an ongoing armed conflict or civil war. There is a sudden increase in inflammatory rhetoric and hate propaganda with the objective of creating fear of the other group. Political processes such as peace accords that threaten the total dominance of the genocidal group or upcoming elections that may cost them their grip on total power may actually trigger genocide.

Prevention of preparation may include arms embargos and commissions to enforce them. It should include prosecution of incitement and conspiracy to commit genocide, both crimes under Article 3 of the Genocide Convention.

8. PERSECUTION: Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity. Death lists are drawn up. In state sponsored genocide, members of victim groups may be forced to wear identifying symbols. Their property is often expropriated. Sometimes they are even segregated into ghettoes, deported into concentration camps, or confined to a famine-struck region and starved. They are deliberately deprived of resources such as water or food in order to slowly destroy them. Programs are implemented to prevent procreation through forced sterilization or abortions. Children are forcibly taken from their parents. The victim group’s basic human rights become systematically abused through extrajudicial killings, torture and forced displacement. Genocidal massacres begin. They are acts of genocide because they intentionally destroy part of a group. The perpetrators watch for whether such massacres meet any international reaction. If not, they realize that that the international community will again be bystanders and permit another genocide.

At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. If the political will of the great powers, regional alliances, or U.N. Security Council or the U.N. General Assembly can be mobilized, armed international intervention should be prepared, or heavy assistance provided to the victim group to prepare for its self-defense. Humanitarian assistance should be organized by the U.N. and private relief groups for the inevitable tide of refugees to come.

9. EXTERMINATION begins, and quickly becomes the mass killing legally called “genocide.” It is “extermination” to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human. When it is sponsored by the state, the armed forces often work with militias to do the killing. Sometimes the genocide results in revenge killings by groups against each other, creating the downward whirlpool-like cycle of bilateral genocide (as in Burundi). Acts of genocide demonstrate how dehumanized the victims have become. Already dead bodies are dismembered; rape is used as a tool of war to genetically alter and eradicate the other group. Destruction of cultural and religious property is employed to annihilate the group’s existence from history. The era of “total war” began in World War II. Firebombing did not differentiate civilians from non-combatants. The civil wars that broke out after the end of the Cold War have also not differentiated civilians and combatants. They result in widespread war crimes. Mass rapes of women and girls have become a characteristic of all modern genocides. All men of fighting age are murdered in some genocides. In total genocides all the members of the targeted group are exterminated.

At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection. (An unsafe “safe” area is worse than none at all.) The U.N. Standing High Readiness Brigade, EU Rapid Response Force, or regional forces — should be authorized to act by the U.N. Security Council if the genocide is small. For larger interventions, a multilateral force authorized by the U.N. should intervene. If the U.N. Security Council is paralyzed, regional alliances must act anyway under Chapter VIII of the U.N. Charter or the UN General Assembly should authorize action under the Uniting for Peace Resolution GARes. 330 (1950), which has been used 13 times for such armed intervention. Since 2005, the international responsibility to protect transcends the narrow interests of individual nation states. If strong nations will not provide troops to intervene directly, they should provide the airlift, equipment, and financial means necessary for regional states to intervene.

10. DENIAL is the final stage that lasts throughout and always follows genocide. It is among the surest indicators of further genocidal massacres. The perpetrators of genocide dig up the mass graves, burn the bodies, try to cover up the evidence and intimidate the witnesses. They deny that they committed any crimes, and often blame what happened on the victims. They block investigations of the crimes, and continue to govern until driven from power by force, when they flee into exile. There they remain with impunity, like Pol Pot or Idi Amin, unless they are captured and a tribunal is established to try them.

The best response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts. There the evidence can be heard, and the perpetrators punished. Tribunals like the Yugoslav, Rwanda or Sierra Leone Tribunals, the tribunal to try the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia, or the International Criminal Court may not deter the worst genocidal killers. But with the political will to arrest and prosecute them, some may be brought to justice. When possible, local proceedings should provide forums for hearings of the evidence against perpetrators who were not the main leaders and planners of a genocide, with opportunities for restitution and reconciliation. The Rwandan gaçaça trials are one example. Justice should be accompanied by education in schools and the media about the facts of a genocide, the suffering it caused its victims, the motivations of its perpetrators, and the need for restoration of the rights of its victims.

 

Read more here: From the Corona Lockdowns via the Great Reset into the Fascistoid Technocracy – a Joint Venture between the WEF Magnates and the Chinese Regime

Print Friendly, PDF & Email